linda-brooks.com
paid for by the Committee to Elect Linda S Brooks to the US Congress
linda-brooks.com
paid for by the Committee to Elect Linda S Brooks to the US Congress
September 2022
Written by Linda S Brooks
Disguising the truth that is distributed to the public is not anything new; unless we are speaking of a free democratic society with the idea in mind that it is the people who rule. For instance, presently being disguised is that the West has become an aggressor including the participation of the United Nations. The beginning of the Ukraine-Russian conflict was with the 2014 initiation of a Separatist Movement; a conflict that before the invasion by Russia, had resulted in over 18,000 Ukrainian deaths that included Russian Ukrainians who favored the Russo-Ukrainian alliance. Now Putin announces the plan to draft 300,000 reservists to secure Ukraine territory to be voted on by four districts in the Ukraine for annexation; however, what we are not being told or maybe reminded of is that NATO also raised a challenge several months ago to advance their own 300,000 military in support Ukraine. This is a travesty of propaganda by installing a half lie presented by the news but whose source or influence is politically motivated. The Ukraine has never agreed to join NATO; If anyone cannot see that the aggressor is the West, they’re blind as a bat or are simply lying because their favored political whatever is not going to be stained by them.
The UN was responsible for controlling the last Balkan War in the 90s that resulted in the Expansion of the EU with whom the UN negotiated the Balkan addition. Now it's Western Ukraine they want to add to the EU where resources and territory would benefit the prior acquisition but moreover the Ukraine would get an endowment from the EU for its new membership which will be quite substantial if that is done. . All things considered including aid from other States, the Ukraine would do very well; in fact, they will become enormously wealthy provided they don’t spend it all on the War; that is assuming we’re not dealing with the Ukraine acting as a Bag Man—does anyone know how to contact wikileaks? Additionally, You will remember that in 2013 Russia awarded the Ukraine $20 billion, the highest aid package on record, to retain the Ukraine in their sphere of influence which was a gentleman’s agreement or at least an assumption given the generosity Russia extended; . . . [moreover] the bridge built by Russia connecting [the Ukraine] to the Russian penninsula costs millions; and the Minsk Protocol established in 2014 with the Ukraine to be protected by the OSCE and Russia for dialogue and resolution of the Civil strife between East-West Ukraine.
This brings us to believe that it is not the Russian Invasion that is central to the conflict; but on the United Nations new Charter where they are claiming an authority independent of national sovereignty and with NATO assuming defense of the posture being displayed by the UN as they’re military arm. What ’s coming to the forefront, according to Tom Buchanan, in his book “Europes Troubled Peace: 1945 to the present”, Europe has a problem: that is that globalization works against Collectivism which Europe has been since the later part of the 20th century. Globalism opens the gates not only concerning economic trade with other nations a the minimum; but it also opens the gates to labor and everything that accompanies it; moreover challenging the existing competition on the resident labor force. This is what is hurting Europe along with insufficient resources and the fact that the communist presence in the newly acquired region that the EU obtained in the recent decades negotiated by the UN, obviously moves against the historic paradigm of the European Economic-Political model which tends toward the far right; not the communist left of which Russia is no longer a part, another propaganda slander presently being advanced in the Ukraine conflict, that Russia is still communist when the consensus by political experts is that Russia has indeed democratized, nurtured by the Republican Party in the US; moreover is at the 25 year threshold that establishes success; Russia’s intent to democratize is cooberated in Riasanovsky and Steinberg’s book “A History of Russia,” 7th Edition; moreover, that this process actually started during Preistroika before Kruschev’s death. Additionally, problems for Europe also includes the traditions of the Islamic faith establishing another challenge brought by globalization. Together, it seems that modernization is once again creating a problem in Europe as it did in the early 20th century with Russia being painted as guilty by the guilty.
I would ask the question, when did the US agree to this New Charter and did the Senate process a ratification of a new Treaty with the UN. In my opinion, the new UN Charter would demand a new Treaty (see below the UN requirement for this document) especially since the Charter made sweeping claims of authority everywhere in the world; this, when its original sole purpose was to act as a mediator for peace between Third World countries who historically have been the cause for global wars. To the point, specifically, what documents exist that originated with the New UN Charter that now legitimizes the relationship between the UN and the US? Are we protected from a global organization that is radicalizing as the US ambassador to the UN claims is happening in her speech to the UN withdrawing the US from the UN’s Human Rights Council— SEE “US Ambassador Nikki Haley announces US leaves UN Human Rights Council published June 2018: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44552304 — President Donald Trump also pulled the US out of several UN programs written in the same article: quote: “Under President Donald Trump, the U.S. withdrew from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in October 2017 and June 2018 respectively.” It These incidents makes it clear that the US hegemony is being imputed upon not only Third World countries, but on those who are the enemies of the US; does this give cause for withdrawal; especially, in light of NATO’s aggression on behalf of the UN. To answer the question I posited above: does the US still have an agreement with the UN; I would say they do not; nonetheless, what is occurring is that the US is continuing to use the existing 1945 agreement incrementally adjusting the New Charter as the US deems fit; in others, they’re stipulating that “ We will not do that” but leaving in place where the US “we will do that. This is not the best way to do it; in fact it could be dangerous by which I mean it could happen where the US crosses a line unintentionally possibly setting a precedent.
I have looked for the existence of an original re-ratificatin of the kind the UN required and I have not been able to find it. But what I have found is that the US is doing exactly as I have described here. Additionally, I have written my Congressmen and the State Department to find out if there is any agreement of any kind regarding a re-statement of the existing UN Treaty, which I will point out makes the five members of the UN a permanent seat. Exactly what that holds Im not sure; but it may explain the incrementalist fashion that the US has taken to protect itself. If I hear differently from the two sources I have contacted I will publish them.
In closing I will state the essence of concern: The UN begins its new era with its new Charter while Boutros-Boutros Ghali was the UN Secretary General with its driving intent to hold peace in the world by force if needed claiming a right to invade any country that posed a threat to global peace whether a member State or not. Moreover, any Treaty that a member State has with another country must register that Treaty with the UN and if not they may not invoke the Treaty amongst any organ of the UN. It does state that member States must sign onto the New Charter respective of “Constitutional processes (Article 110).” This tells us that the United Nations brought to the attention of every member State that (1) they must sign onto the new charter; and (2) it is each States responsibility to fulfill any constitutional processes required of their nation. I have been trying to find where the US ratified the New UN Charter without success as of yet. I leave you with this fact: the West, including the UN, is the aggressor in this Ukranian conflict that is mushrooming into a global War as we speak and as we watch the States of the Western alliance including the UN; and we are astonished as they proceed to actually foster a global war. Without a doubt this is an oxymoron when speaking of the Champions of Peace and Freedom; the only explanation that see possible is that they are responding to a threat that 22nd Century modernization is placing before them; and they see failure looming on the horizon with China central to that anxiety— or, we may be thinking in terms of imperialist opportunity.
Politics and Other Anomalies by Linda S Brooks is a Florida LLC FEIN 88-2001600
NOTES:
1. United Nations Charter, Chapter XIX:
Ratification and Signature
Article 110
2. 1992 Interview: Setting a New Agenda for the United Nations,
Boutros Boutros-Ghali Secretary General of the United Nations
3. “US Ambassador Nikki Haley announces US leaves UN Human Rights Council published June 2018: https://www.jstor.org/page-scan-delivery/get-page-scan/24357136/0
A GIFT:
🇺🇸2021 Politics and Other Anomalies Political Analysis Essays 🇺🇸Personally signed by Linda S Brooks—A gift to any supporter making a single donation equal to or greater than $500.
I also have for $100 donations the book Common Sense by Thomas Paine excellent small book that explains the logic that went into the US Constitution.
Copyright © 2021 POLITICS and OTHER ANOMALIES with Linda S Brooks. - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy Website Builder