I suggest that inherent Resolve is better assigned as the Middle East Footprint rather than to spread them over the Pacific Rim hunting down ISIS which is the current plan. Information on ISIS last year was that it would become very loosely organized in which different terrroist groups could come together, then fan out, then coming together and fanning out again repeatedly claiming that each group of Terrorist could go home for a while and then return. However, this pattern is very illusive; moreover, an identifiable guirrilla tactic. Pursuit of our enemy has already been won in the Middle East and so has the prize and the retribution for the 9/11 Attack. Rather than allow ourselves to be drawn out, thinly, could turn out to be a trap as it was in Vietnam in which China blended in with the Viet Kong eventually forcing US withdrawal. China is now all over the Pacific Rim: in Africa and the Philippines supporting the Communist Movement there
very conveniently pulling away; however, as the US has acquired battle plans with the Philippino government. China is also very interested in India and Pakistan, where wealth is supposed mirror what China has achieved with Hong Kong and Singapore is still seen as a catch for them. Is it possible that we would be leaving the Hen House unprotected by being lured off into these far away places when the real prize is the Middle East region? Is it plausable, that by chasing ISIS across the Pacific Rim is merely a way to draw US forces into a China snare that will cost the US its victory. Securing the Middle East region, I believe, is a better plan, less dangerous and moreover, establishing the the Oil capital of the world, to which China is it number one consumer, as a US protected territory could bring China to its knees without chasing the spider into its web. And by no means does the US want to fight as foot soldiers nor guerrilla; but primarily missile warfare.
- The purpose of Democratization, by definition, is to achieve the highest level of freedom possible within a territorial state ruled by the people; not to continue a dependency and servitude upon an elitist as characterized in European Collectivism. Proof that this was the intent is described by Aristide R. Zolberg in his 2006 book A Nation by Design: Immigration Policy dedicated to an inquiry proving that the US did not have a singular “open door” policy on immigration, as is often claimed, in the inceptual years of building the country; rather, the central objective was to establish a free country populated by a people capable of both receiving and contributing to that purpose: a people with the capacity to rule the first democracy in world history. He points out that the primary lesson learned by the founders was the detrimental effects of European Aristocratic collectivism upon freedom; therefore, intentionally developed a plan of immigration that would proscribe a civic culture dependent on a society composed of strong individualism and self-dependency. However, a dilemma has developed in US Immigration Policy: the family system for immigration often times closes the doors to any professional grade immigrants. There needs to be economic balance so that the US isn't always bringing in the poor. And why should the US feel responsible for the careless and discriminatory policies of South American leaders who are heavily weighted with European Collectivist ideas. That was the attitude and policy of President Bush who cut foreign aid if they didn't allow their minority groups to be fully enfranchised. And now, as former Governor of Florida Jeb Bush indicated, the Baby Anchor scheme is playing out only its not just babies its hundreds of children sent across the US borders alone; but just as the Dreamers didn't stay alone expecting the program to eventually grow by another 5 million people, its very probable neither will these children that are coming in now who will be used to legitimize their families who remain in South America. The argument brought by Zolberg and many other Americans, is that there needs to be balance, not always taking but giving and with an intent of self dependency and to Americanize avoiding the situation that occurred in the US in the 90s where when prison populations were 50% immigrants and Summary Hearings were occurring swiftly deporting immigrants who were encapable of making it here in a free capitalist society.
-Social Security for the Elderly,
-Unemployment for the Labor Force
-Medicaid for the poor.
Constitutional Amendment to Secure a Basic Social Safety Net
Social Security for the Elderly, Unemployment for the Labor Force, Medicaid for the poor.
These are the only social programs we want to Constitutionally protect. Social Security was created during President Roosevelt’s terms because they knew they were taking chances with new economic policies that were risky; specifically, Keyesnian Economics which advocated negative spending that Congress doesn't seem to be able to overcome even today with a National debt exceeding $23 trillion. Unemployment is a social program that dates all the way back to Bizmark in Germany and is just as sound an idea now as it was then to cover periods of routine national unemployment. Medicaid is also another sound idea provided by each State, not at the Federal level, but undergirded by Federal grants. These three safety nets are worthy for us to preserve constitutionally for the American people.
When abortion became law in the 1970s, Sociologist said eventually infanticide would occur beyond the womb and just as in China, who legally allows a childs murder up to two years of age, so here in the US shall it also occur that young children are not legally viewed as having a right to live. Not only are children being killed after birth but some are being killed to harvest their organs. This is appalling and must not be allowed in a supposed civilized nation. If we don't stop this now, Euphenasia of the Old and the infirmed is next. HR 619, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act submitted to the House in January 2021, is a great beginning, however, they probably will find that law already exists targeting premies. My intent is, however, to go beyond to children 2 or 3 years of age and even beyond to adulthood having learned to be a criminal. More to the point, I am not speaking of creating new law, which in this case already exists, but to undergird enforcement of existing laws that has fallen through the cracks because an particular society is given extradimary rights. For instance, there exist a law that prohibits people from selling their own body parts nor someone else doing this for them.
This is not an issue that highlights the need for law, but reveals a gap in law enforcement that in our time is surfacing as a major problem. Additionally, engages Human Trafficking that goes all the way down to a sweet sixteen sitting in an American classroom who is taken in at the lowest level by Human Traffickers to either sell their baby’s, prostitute them or harvest their organs to sell on the black market with proceeds being split with the birthing mother and if she likes that, she can have a baby every year and a half for future income. Moreover, at the top level, Human Traffickers have the money to buy participants out of prison, to pay off government officials and so on.
The point is, lack of ENFORCEMENT has fostered lawlessness. If grace was given to a society who begged the influence of extraneious circumstances, that under different circumstances would not exist, they have failed to make their point and the proof is that their crime is now done in the open and nobody stops it; perades that include life as a sado-mass is taking place and noone stops it. Social mores and slack law enforcement in the US has degenerated to the point that sado massichism has found an acceptable place: there are medical units in hospitals that openly specialize in sado-mass medicine, trailers at the back of hospitals where children are taught how to orgy, theft of mens sperm while in a hospital to breed babies for market and where euphenasia at all ages is being introduced if you can pay the price; child care organizations for sado-mass children to continue their training-all with the intent of enslavement. What is being built is a crime population whose only way of making a living is thru extortion, murder and maheim. And it doesn't stop at the young age either when most Americans have the right of choice; young adults are gang raped at work just so they understand who they are and how they're going to live and they aren’t allowed to work outside the sado-mass culture either--their enslavement is absolute where the use of torture keeps them. So don't be too hard on China's religiously based killing of the Uyghur Muslim (Epoch Times April 7-13, 2021) prisoners to harvest their organs; we're not far behind. Slavery, child abuse and Murder is against the law in this country at any age and I want to see these laws enforced to the maximum, including any government official who was bought, in this field of crime because it is an assualt against the most helpless segment of our society, who are children, moreover, a whole population is being developed in our country that purposely perpetuates brutality and sadism unabated. There’s no excuse for it; for this blind spot in our legal and social culture. You think is not a problem? How are your children doing in grade school?
Its a failed program and to try to save it means higher taxes. The HMO advantage plans are bankrupting, hospitals are closing across the country and Medicare, in general, is bankrupting. Are we going to wait until it takes six months to schedule a surgery. Let the people go back to the free market where premiums can be competitive. Already both the employee and the employer are paying equal shares in the paycheck and those on Medicare are being means tested beginning at $80,000 annual income and up. As Milton Friedman, Nobel Prize winner in Economics, said 'the only reason Medicare was created was because the Medical elite claimed an opportunity to draw a lot of money into their industry. The Medicare funds that suddenly was poured into the economy caused the Medical industry to go through the roof and now young couples can’t afford medical care for their children without government help. The American people are going to loose their freedom if they don't trash this failing socialist nightmare.
Safety Net: Desalinization & Interstate Utility Sharing in times of Emergency
The US population has increased 200% in one century going from 108m in 1921 to 330m people in 2019. Already the west is short of water and in Florida its being fought over with those who want to access the aquifer. Its not that the natural resources in the US are being lost for lack of conservation; but I dont think that the growth of the population, increasing geometrically, can be ignored. So rather than wait to see if the US desertifies or a national crisis occurs particularly due to demand, let's start building a safety net undergirding desalinazation, already being developed in the US but still not cost effective yet and removing the barriers of regulations barring help between states. These regulations are apparently too rigid making it difficult to speedily resolve shortages. Lets add infrastructure that will remedy this delimma now while we have the opportunity rather than wait and wind up with what happened in Texas where over a hundred million gallons of water was lost because of bursting frozen pipes and the residents having to wait for negotiations to clear regulations. You do know that Texas, Arizona and parts of California are desertifying? I think with the 2020 pandemic, we have learned the benefit of preparedness something I learned a long time ago in asset and property management. But not only the pandemic, but our vulnerability to war demands this coverage for protection.
✅ Pro Life, except when the mothers life is at risk, Constitutional Protection for Children at Birth & States Rights
✅ 2nd Amend. Right to Self Defense, Defense of our Political System and the Right to bear Arms
✅Sovereignty of the People thru the US Constitution
✅ A Free Market Capitalist System with minimum Social programs
✅ Foreign Aid & Immigration while preserving the Intergrity of the Well Being of Our People
✅ Our Own Military
✅ Minimal Government and Tax Maintenance
✅ Against the idea of a Hate Speech Law
✅ Environmental Law in line with a Capitalist Economy built for Prosperity
Please observe FEC limits; excess amounts have to be refunded.
Individuals. Up to $2900 per election (52 U.S.C. § 30116(a)(1)(A)
As per Contribution Limits for 2021-2022 Donors
For further information, please contact: Federal Election Commission Washington, DC 20463 (800) 424-9530; (202) 694-1100 firstname.lastname@example.org